[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Digest for berkeleylug@googlegroups.com - 10 updates in 2 topics



Thomas and All:

     I have been using Jitsi and like it.  Two things I have found: an “&” in the string causes your virtual “room” to fail and I have had unexpected failures with virtual “room” addresses.  Always test the “room” address before sending it out. 

-- Chris Peeples --






On Sunday, May 3, 2020, 11:11:09 AM UTC, berkeleylug@googlegroups.com <berkeleylug@googlegroups.com> wrote:


tom r lopes <tomrlopes@gmail.com>: May 02 03:03PM -0700

What is the deal with snap and or flatpack?
 
I'm still installing via apt but I guess if you are going the gui route
you will see snaps.
 
What is the use case here?
 
I thought I was doing good when I realized I could hunt and peck apt
instead of apt-get.
 
Also if there are any Arch users out there: What do you do to keep AUR up
to date? Is there a way to hook into pacman? I guess I could see how
Manjaro does it.
 
Thomas
Rick Moen <rick@linuxmafia.com>: May 02 03:48PM -0700


> I'm still installing via apt but I guess if you are going the gui route
> you will see snaps.
 
> What is the use case here?
 
In my probably cynical opinion, the use case is: 'I'm from the
proprietary software world and expect applications to be bundled with
everything they need including libs, rather than going through the
bother of keeping applications in harmony with system libs, like one of
those long-haired open source hippies.'
 
Flatpaks are able to be created in a decentralised fashion by any old
person. They're more than a bit like PPAs, except with more
self-contained bundling of software resources. Snap packages are under
the central thumb of Canonical, Ltd., feed through Canonical's Snap
online 'package store' (only), and can be contributed to only if you
sign a licensing agreement with Canonical, Ltd.
 
The whole thing is obviously inspired by the Docker container-software
craze in cloud computing, which itself has a lot of that proprietary
software mentality behind it.
 
The Ubuntu propaganda machine is of course pushing Snap. Flatpak has a
more diverse rah-rah squad including Docker types and gamer punks, and
unlike Snap/snapd isn't distro-specific. Fans of either implementation
tend to call them 'universal installers', rather than the unflattering
characterisation I've made of them above. (In case it isn't obvious, I
personally have no use for either one, and think they're both yet
another way to try to replicate the mistakes of Microsoft Windows, for
which, no thanks.)
 
And _of course_ Canonical is in the middle of the latest of those
efforts, because it's always trying to make itself relevant by muscling
into anything currently fashionable.
 
Views Differ[tm].
tom r lopes <tomrlopes@gmail.com>: May 02 04:42PM -0700

Yeah, Rick, that was what I thought.
 
And you mention Docker ...
I'm curious about that too. I haven't played with it yet. But Docker
makes
sense to me as a way to run like a VM without the using up the space.
But then I see people talk about Docker on the PI and I go "what the hell"
 
Thomas
 
Rick Moen <rick@linuxmafia.com>: May 02 04:55PM -0700


> And you mention Docker ... I'm curious about that too. I haven't
> played with it yet. But Docker makes sense to me as a way to run like
> a VM without the using up the space.
 
Well, sort of. Except not.
 
Docker first arose on cloud clusters (including without limitations
Amazon AWS. When it was new and shiny, I kept asking the proponents
'Hey, how are you going to protect security, given that you lack the
host/guest isolation that's automatic with real hypervisor software
like KVM / VirtualBox / VMware?' And the answer was always a close
variant on 'Uh, yeah, security! It'll be great. We'll have that nailed
down Real Soon Now.'
 
I could be wrong, but I don't think they have it nailed down, and don't
think it'll ever be really good in that area.
 
> But then I see people talk about Docker on the PI and I go "what the hell"
 
Some people talk about a pair of things and without thinking imagine that
the two of them together must automatically be a good thing, like,
dunno, maybe injections and disinfectants. ;->
Alan Davis <alan3davis@gmail.com>: May 02 08:11PM -0700

I've been using Manjaro, which almost boils down to using Arch. I can only
provide a tentative answer to your question about keeping AUR up to date: I
don't know all the ins and outs. I use an AUR Helper, if you will, called
"Yay". It is fantastic! A command line tool the runs almost all pacman
commands transparently, for the official distro and AUR packages. I only
have learned a few options, the ones that I need to stay sane. AFAICR, it
is possible to get a listing of packages installed from AUR. If not,
Pamac-manager is, I think, installed with pamac, by default on Manjaro.
The GUI enables me to enable various repositories, including AUR; and
whether to check for AUR updates.
 
AFAICT, yay keeps AUR packages up to date. For almost all pacman
commands/options, yay works as a transparent replacement for pacman.
Unlike pacman (but similar to Yaourt, which it replaces) It does not
require to use sudo to run, as a mere mortal, but does ask for a password
later on.
 
I've had few problems, and cannot remember when I've needed to manually
update a package from AUR. Maybe a few. No more PPDs for me. Damn!
This distro works so well, I've gotten lazy.
 
Alan Davis
 
 
 
 
--
 
"This ignorance about the limits of the earth's ability to absorb
pollutants should be reason enough for caution in the release
of polluting substances."
---Meadows et al. 1972. Limits to Growth
<https://www.dartmouth.edu/~library/digital/publishing/meadows/ltg/>.
(p. 81)
tom r lopes <tomrlopes@gmail.com>: May 02 02:29PM -0700

Just saw this
https://opensource.com/article/20/5/free-software-communication
 
List of open source remote communication.
 
As you know I'm going to try a Jitsi meeting tomorrow. I'm going to use the
meet.jit.si server but it is possible too run your own Jitsi meet server.
 
Right now it seems that Zoom is the most popular one. I looked at it myself
and was taken aback at having to download and run something. But it turns
out you can run zoom from the browser.
Go to a zoom link. You get a pop up to run something. Cancel that and find
"click here if doesn't open". Cancel the pop up again. Now near the bottom
is "run in browser".
 
Thomas
Rick Moen <rick@linuxmafia.com>: May 02 03:34PM -0700


> Just saw this
> https://opensource.com/article/20/5/free-software-communication
 
> List of open source remote communication.
 
Coolness. I've seen that before at FSF's blog, and it's a good article.

> As you know I'm going to try a Jitsi meeting tomorrow. I'm going to use the
> meet.jit.si server but it is possible too run your own Jitsi meet server.
 
Plan on many participants having to spend a lot of their initial session
debugging their local microphone & camera setups. (This is true with
any videoconferencing, not something specific to Jitsi Meet.)
 
> Right now it seems that Zoom is the most popular one.
 
Reasonably so -- but it should be borne in mind that they have a
business angle: Free-of-charge public sessions are generously offered,
but with a 40 minute duration limit per videoconference session.
tom r lopes <tomrlopes@gmail.com>: May 02 04:36PM -0700

> > https://opensource.com/article/20/5/free-software-communication
 
> > List of open source remote communication.
 
> Coolness. I've seen that before at FSF's blog, and it's a good article.
 
Yes it is the same article. The author just reprinted it on opensource.com
.
I was out (eh violating stay at home) and it looked better on mobile.
 
 
> Plan on many participants having to spend a lot of their initial session
> debugging their local microphone & camera setups. (This is true with
> any videoconferencing, not something specific to Jitsi Meet.)
 
It is likely to be just me talking to myself. But it is very possible that
I'll have trouble conferencing to myself (The mind is getting foggy now)
 
Thomas
 
Rick Moen <rick@linuxmafia.com>: May 02 04:50PM -0700


> It is likely to be just me talking to myself. But it is very possible that
> I'll have trouble conferencing to myself (The mind is getting foggy now)
 
Assuming you send out the meeting details, and I see them in time, I'd
be delighted to join you. I've done a lot of both Jitsi Meet and Zoom,
so my own setup is tested-good, and maybe can help verify that you're
getting across the video link to me and to anyone else attending.
 
--
Cheers, @kareem_carr: "I discovered a new statistical law, that says that
Rick Moen all jokes on Twitter are based on other jokes on Twitter."
rick@linux friend: "That's really cool! What do you call it?"
mafia.com @kareem_carr: *slowly doffs sunglasses" "Regression to the meme."
tom r lopes <tomrlopes@gmail.com>: May 02 04:56PM -0700

It will be meet.jit.si/berkeleypi
 
I'll email when ready hopefully by noon
 
Thomas
 
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to berkeleylug+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BerkeleyLUG" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to berkeleylug+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/berkeleylug/1438013824.366862.1588527160363%40mail.yahoo.com.