Toby DiPasquale on 19 Jul 2007 17:44:21 -0000 |
On 7/19/07, Andrew Gwozdziewycz <apgwoz@gmail.com> wrote: > I think we are both a bit confused by each others comments. For one, I'm not > sure what the CLR has to do with Scala, other than the fact it is a > virtual machine. > Scala *does not* compile to CLR compatible code. J# which does compile to > CLR code, *is not* compatible with Scala compiled to the JVM. I fully understand all that you've said thus far. My original comment was saying that I disagreed with the statement that Scala looked like it was hacked up by some Java guys, and said that instead I thought that F# looked like it was "hacked up" by some .NET CLR guys, thus filling the "hacked up" slot of functional languages on imperative-based VMs. It was, in essence, a joke. -- Toby DiPasquale --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Philly Lambda" group. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to philly-lambda-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/philly-lambda?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
|
|