Jonathan Tran on 2 Apr 2008 14:08:45 -0700


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Follow up to Scheme

  • From: "Jonathan Tran" <jonnytran@gmail.com>
  • To: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
  • Subject: Re: Follow up to Scheme
  • Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 17:08:26 -0400
  • Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jonnytran@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jonnytran@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-sender:x-apparently-to:received:received:received-spf:authentication-results:received:dkim-signature:domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:reply-to:sender:precedence:x-google-loop:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-unsubscribe; bh=YfKgMstp3vQOHUQyOlcLq/Y9/GrvJJhB1nzaZiPT/Do=; b=S2uhKiRkULEWjJFwNoas7KyN0LBAuA+36qQ0QSIA9xXUda2rXKgy4T/H3UKA+MaffLEeGLvw3vxZjisPI/SqnvSPV4ywUSJFbaMQ4mk/i740GvIzMHUAZdLuJYG001xmVs+HoZ7gjqTUEh17G/QELJkj8BGduaWpZL5pMjhaAA0=
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=dkCSwShxWoB/FRRfqg0TJo+28WcCqc6DaKDv5bKHpuw=; b=TQCBpT03+8+QqRYHbgxgk5yJCOrrJgOF9SbGhQtfwG5gH/zOmMWrFhu8BOrr4mE9u3hmvkPI7kTbDQuQsw3+DcHMsULZarPSGs8e8yocPil1k2HUZ8D2EmHHIkfyeXsEcJyXTSPLEeglU0EZp9WPrejxifMQVLfkler38/HpFPM=
  • Mailing-list: list philly-lambda@googlegroups.com; contact philly-lambda-owner@googlegroups.com
  • Reply-to: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
  • Sender: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com

Sounds good to me.

On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Aaron Feng <aaron.feng@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  How about 4/16 for toby's presentation.
>
>  Part 2 of the haskell in May?
>