Kyle R. Burton on 12 May 2008 09:39:12 -0700


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A Philly Lambda Project

  • From: "Kyle R. Burton" <kyle.burton@gmail.com>
  • To: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
  • Subject: Re: A Philly Lambda Project
  • Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 12:38:47 -0400
  • Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kyle.burton@gmail.com designates 64.233.170.185 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kyle.burton@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-sender:x-apparently-to:received:received:received-spf:authentication-results:received:dkim-signature:domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:reply-to:sender:precedence:x-google-loop:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-unsubscribe; bh=8r/HNHnx2SWfOXnBymuNl/5GM3+FBQ9ovVDCx/IKIfg=; b=X4uS/uoCa42uLyRPpmOJp+gAw5/0oo29rx15i0RKfnBA+sLtOnqNI7NK5CL+Yww9ZvKCWSuDBWM3k0UjunBAADMzAT+/AhRElhLTlL4+MrczA/8i+nQV7aVpKJPM475hNwmSEymG2dQ0J05h3Pr6peQRoSDSf5aur2BZ84SQTSA=
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=e7NYcIlt7ovB8s3TxXtwZavyVSZOUfQPJxjwPjdDays=; b=ijgvBhXqJ1CZjfyHfvV34jHqSeuo3SskL20px0ROstPNGyd3huZOsCOurfEIlTK3ycfwX/TzfmMtIJ0zOzx83C1Z1d1yhLkLvx0nqPx6nBI3TbCBFIg2YALEZi8z6YPeA3yhXoRwd5irXFXy8CVFizh2/NfPAxg8lpdrVTx4MYU=
  • Mailing-list: list philly-lambda@googlegroups.com; contact philly-lambda-owner@googlegroups.com
  • Reply-to: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
  • Sender: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Jonathan Tran <jonnytran@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  You're right.  I've made the silly mistake of re-inventing the ICFP contest. :-P

If you're joking then good, so was I, hence the '*ducks*'.

>  Just forget I said anything.

No fscking way - come up with a concrete thing, just as you suggested,
what meets your criteria of useful?   I took a shot at that, it'd be
cool if you at least evaluated each of those (minus the ICFP) based on
your criteria.

Kyle