[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
You don't understand. I'm not locked up in here with all of you. You're all locked up in here with me."
|
- From: "Kyle R. Burton" <kyle.burton@gmail.com>
- To: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
- Subject: You don't understand. I'm not locked up in here with all of you. You're all locked up in here with me."
- Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 17:20:24 -0400
- Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kyle.burton@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kyle.burton@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-sender:x-apparently-to :received:received:received-spf:authentication-results:received :dkim-signature:domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id :date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:reply-to:sender :precedence:x-google-loop:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-unsubscribe:x-beenthere; bh=toJFMmCqtlJI3leMTZAXHJ/hbREJCOVpfBuR3sBJik4=; b=GhHj8GkGhPV5PSu5WBFS4N9marAaLv9KEhnVAh8/tApMi55atFXvzBVZfmWUJU3pjM Ky+LddVLA8OxSK+z+7HCFK9Rm15Aa5Ej0YxCd33acMRs6utfsotU/epQ/7kVRVFGPQmu 01Iuw870TPI3p/Ri21KuG/vD//6o5LofxUPTg=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=TAmS3eN+R5THuTwHkdmxhJUCWUig78PYn0FxrNWkSzo=; b=jHRoRZyfiq+TxuS1QwVEbJiCxy3xc1JR8m6h4QZ1pAg2mUKByj5lATbz/tbTw89bXS 6T3mTcIf6zQFhTvbgUTmRniDq4eVBc2qCPBNMvfMXKkYFWbz6vPN0umBrvLbHayeGV2r KI0ZiS3LOO9RZzGvmgPetRtA/4ANxJe6eBEd8=
- Mailing-list: list philly-lambda@googlegroups.com; contact philly-lambda-owner@googlegroups.com
- Reply-to: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
- Sender: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
So, it looks like Josh and I are going to embark on refactoring some
elisp so it's less specific to our current environment and so it's
more generic and re-useable (extensible). Josh has created a google
code project:
http://code.google.com/p/perl-devel-mode/
and we've uploaded some broken code to it. Our plans are to turn it
into a full blown mode, taking inspiration from cperl-mode and
paredit-mode (we've already got a very rudimentary kill-expression
which has helped our productivity). Anyone else willing to give
guidance as we start on the path of making it into a mode?
Also, why aren't we using this list to talk about FP? Is the group
good if we use it to discuss what we're doing in elisp? Not pure FP,
but still a lisp.
?
Kyle
|
|