Mark Chadwick on 10 May 2009 16:55:18 -0700


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: lambda hack night

  • From: Mark Chadwick <mark.chadwick@gmail.com>
  • To: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
  • Subject: Re: lambda hack night
  • Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 19:54:21 -0400
  • Authentication-results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mark.chadwick@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.208 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mark.chadwick@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-sender:x-apparently-to :received:received:received-spf:authentication-results:received :dkim-signature:domainkey-signature:mime-version:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :reply-to:sender:precedence:x-google-loop:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-unsubscribe:x-beenthere-env:x-beenthere; bh=GRMfIi/H4yzixv8frYQAaWkCK38djjBxYGZXXwWzA10=; b=60n8gktjZur/TNpuVwOptJbVAhx41n3F5ltDeMMIKP/5SKkEMHB8d57EKfYtUvatfx gho1VcPKJemHQ+Q9wgBKqU1jCM+PN6PDUGVDE48iqVTUFsGcA9n/Jl3WG4OCyMhQqlHY 1NjK50bTF74l3yeTtFefGVQLVD9Y5G49MoHYE=
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mF2Od1z5c5FpeoT4FNBPXLXH5jisqt2m29WpMt5UFxw=; b=Hny2CfWH9Qz1Jr9VJfgwjT6Gwa8QKm2w+u/a7gwSIPKP/NWorV+5dqy3QXsYBqrIc1 Z2E1PXL6kX0JqnsuN3/rL38Rr2bdlNFIdUhToFk37sc2thFXEyTZHfOMwEpomsZL2lqu NerInsheuhznlpjV2pAADW57mO/p2v9ky7PmI=
  • Mailing-list: list philly-lambda@googlegroups.com; contact philly-lambda+owner@googlegroups.com
  • Reply-to: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
  • Sender: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
Wednesday works for me.

> What do u do @ a lamda hack night? Write s expreesions?

I literally laughed out loud.

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Michael Bevilacqua-Linn <michael.bevilacqualinn@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm down for the pound with the gangsta funk on this one.

I'd, uh, like to go as well.