[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: Philly Lambda Meeting
|
- From: Sonny To <son.c.to@gmail.com>
- To: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
- Subject: Re: Philly Lambda Meeting
- Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:04:36 -0400
- Authentication-results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of son.c.to@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.181 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=son.c.to@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-sender:x-apparently-to :received:received:received:received-spf:received:dkim-signature :domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:reply-to:sender:precedence:x-google-loop :mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-unsubscribe :x-beenthere-env:x-beenthere; bh=5d8KuQbvgSh1MnIXDtm/EqwYrKp55GUmOWYFGrPrFOw=; b=m0KmvrsP9dQwJdwSYaimhe2HplCKkNkEARHyA5gFransDPZJ7fBRXuq5lQ/xJlQqkc YhCy3VJTxo/sGljJVkZyyxbMFPYAay2NKJFABWTxUiPk7E6ecou30eznXDx/vlhRGX+i uwzIVAQOktMkxHqeYPWVmXJgMJr0t3blV9qwA=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CY5IEZcywa7LKv4M34IaAFaJ9maQ7Jxx7RkFH5H9aKM=; b=MwysGz14nTADefZ1GvvbLLTiGvQuAQD6ppE1RBdjUjOVjEc8eaooemWBZfd4yGWkIp K9V24Afv3kP1t2u7TjWrrukx91N99fr+8r8bFSt3yDLhqJuLDZBhxCmNtMpQAqVLQsDk nHkNreDli4WQlSb8silFWrhFeNfsCf+jh67Vc=
- Mailing-list: list philly-lambda@googlegroups.com; contact philly-lambda+owner@googlegroups.com
- Reply-to: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
- Sender: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
wedays and fridays are actually better for me too
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Dan Mead <d.w.mead@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> i'd could go if it were a Wednesday or Friday
>
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Aaron Feng <aaron.feng@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Due to various scheduling conflicts, I'm looking into pushing the
>> meeting back a week. Please advise if you will be able to attend the
>> meeting if we push it back to 9/30. If not enough people are
>> interested, we can keep it the same.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Aaron
>>
>
|
|