Dan Mead on 15 Nov 2009 16:06:08 -0800


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: "Go" language

  • From: Dan Mead <d.w.mead@gmail.com>
  • To: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
  • Subject: Re: "Go" language
  • Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:05:41 -0500
  • Authentication-results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of d.w.mead@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.218 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=d.w.mead@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-sender:x-apparently-to :received:received:received:received-spf:received:dkim-signature :domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:reply-to:sender :precedence:x-google-loop:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-unsubscribe:x-beenthere-env:x-beenthere; bh=ZLwpMCe2Bw01xR/Fq8bpGVvf+kCWu2B/Lw0rNXAmx8E=; b=oIx1h415DN+b2gsgEGjssYVFYIqjIpDMRXFlQrgPyaP+C01QwushTYRUutdHejYnD+ tJFIpYjJKFAFAkfY8H/8wQiQWorp7wwmxnkLmVfIaAjSQfNahWJaTF0QwDkmIp2s9SnX KRn8ZcP5Gv4D2nSn36TswNCBB6SrwEdPmnImk=
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=E3xpSH6mnXbaeh8VRwtV8vABU1cUZgN9q+79ls2u4Mc=; b=tgdDzoSFlp1YFXLMYIJcNNKbUxLYvIoHgnQ0g/DElPzWc5/PVeC6590G3eOUOlCCfm SxnYzou1jhkMzQj8KXISc20QFBC9XlVYMrsYgVwJS3v7VJoCjRJoPSjiku7imApE66Ek E9tuPsfEO4dZ3mTpxqSUj3vi1s+Joq8lWI1Oc=
  • Mailing-list: list philly-lambda@googlegroups.com; contact philly-lambda+owner@googlegroups.com
  • Reply-to: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
  • Sender: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
i think they need to change the name to fix issue 9

On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 3:43 PM, John Bunting <codingjester@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's been out awhile and I mean depending on who you talk to, it may just
> start a war on it's usefulness....
>
> So let's see what people think of the new Go.
>
> ~JB
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:27 PM, pezman <mikehogan62@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Possibly old news, but first I heard of it was today ...
>> http://golang.org/
>
>