|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
- From: Dan Mead <d.w.mead@gmail.com>
- To: Philly Lambda <philly-lambda@googlegroups.com>
- Subject: Re: Game of life
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:date :in-reply-to:x-ip:references:user-agent:x-http-useragent:received :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=esy9ZcOLpiYl/LzMiNGHMImGLfwBWN8eyzD6RuaqOFw=; b=SHBF+USCd4DzwrcFWd8/0IAPeaMLaZdKmPJ2WPDOKlSZ7CAK2mjQdSl0iJJ9kc0ggH w1zLLOm5CeaEph+dOywgwHlhc8250RrQ1VAzjh33Nk9aJQv57/GxiVFpob8N1g6ATrza 0aFU1ELly66LyZm4cd2PGAyDAElELesfVIgY0=
- List-archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/philly-lambda?hl=en_US>
- Mailing-list: list philly-lambda@googlegroups.com; contact philly-lambda+owners@googlegroups.com
- Reply-to: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
- Sender: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
- User-agent: G2/1.0
I wrote a viewer for the game of life
http://www.youtube.com/user/stubert311?feature=mhw4
should I package this? it takes text files generated by a game of life
written in your favorite language
and shows it with some nice graphics
-Dan
On Feb 8, 10:46 am, Sean Devlin <francoisdev...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Found this on Reddit today. Don't read if you aren't ready to
> cheat :)
>
> http://www.solussd.com/2009/11/a-clojure-highlife/
>
> On Feb 7, 11:48 pm, Aaron Feng <aaron.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Sean,
>
> > > 1. Is laziness breaking your call do take? Do you need to wrap it in
> > > a doall?
>
> > I don't think that's the problem, I tried doall. It didn't make any
> > difference. The output seems to be different when I do
> > (take 5 (iterate run board)) vs (run (run (run (run board))))
>
> > > 2. After I slept on it, I came to prefer the agent approach to the
> > > iterate. The iterate is good for prototyping, but the agent will be
> > > better for production because of this exact list issue you're seeing.
>
> > True, I'll eventually make an agent version too.
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > Aaron
>
>
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to philly-lambda+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
|
|