[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PhillyOnRails] Business Justification for Ruby
|
Is it worth knowing what folks are using now, to compare ruby's strengths and weaknesses against it? -Alex
On 8/6/07, Colin A. Bartlett <
phillyonrails@colinabartlett.com> wrote:Brian McNamara wrote: > i can use the arguments of rapid development, clear syntax, and rich
> standard library, but what other points could i use? You shouldn't need much more!
Ruby does have some performance implications that are not encountered by most, but could be a problem depending on your application. Be ready to
counter any attacks with statistics on how cheap servers are vs. developer time, etc.
-- Colin A. Bartlett Kinetic Web Solutions http://blog.kineticweb.com
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit: http://lists.phillyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
-- ----- -- ----- Alex Hillman web.developer.innovation.consultant vocal: 484.597.6256 digital: alex@weknowhtml.com
| skype: dangerouslyawesome visual: www.weknowhtml.com | www.dangerouslyawesome.com local:
www.independentshall.org
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
http://lists.phillyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
|
|