|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
a large degree of experience and proficiency with perl. Now how exactly to
determine that is a different matter entirely and I'm not really qualified
to do so. I guess you could determine it by reputation in the perl
community, experience, accomplishments, or maybe having other critics look
at the potential critic's code.
On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, Schuyler D. Erle wrote:
> Nicolai Rosen wrote:
> >
> > So what does everybody think? "Dumb idea Nicolai! Shut your trap!" or
> > could something like that work? It could be a regular event, a one
> > time thing, or even an ongoing web site of some sort.
>
> I'd volunteer, but what exactly would qualify a would-be Perl judge (or critic, if you prefer) for the job?
>
> SDE
> **Majordomo list services provided by PANIX <URL:http://www.panix.com>**
> **To Unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe phl" to majordomo@lists.pm.org**
>
**Majordomo list services provided by PANIX <URL:http://www.panix.com>**
**To Unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe phl" to majordomo@lists.pm.org**
|
|