mjd-perl-pm on Sat, 4 Mar 2000 10:39:30 -0500 (EST) |
> Patents are usually invented (no matter how ridiculous the > invention). "Prior art" is a basis for disqualifying patents. So > if you discover it, it's probably unpatentable. Only if someone else discovered it first and published the results. Another reason an invention might not be patentable is if it's obvious `to one skilled in the art.' One of the many problems with software patents is that the U.S. Patent Office requires certain credentials for patent examiners, and a CS degree is not one of these credentials. You have to have some *other* sort of degree to be a patent examiner, and so very few patent examiners are skilled in CS, and can't tell whether an invention is obvious or not. **Majordomo list services provided by PANIX <URL:http://www.panix.com>** **To Unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe phl" to majordomo@lists.pm.org**
|
|