Nicolai Rosen on Mon, 6 Mar 2000 06:26:39 -0500 (EST) |
I don't really think that that's a fair measure. The higher up features that rarely get used are exclusively Lisp while a lot more of the lower level stuff is C. Besides, emacs is still not Word. I'd like to see somebody do a word like program in a scripted language (hehe, here's where I invite people to contradict me). On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Adam Turoff wrote: > Forwarded message: > > Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 21:09:30 -0500 (EST) > > From: rspier@seas.upenn.edu (Robert Spier) > > To: phl@lists.pm.org > > Subject: Emacs, was Re: YAPAS (Yet Another Python Advocacy Story) > > > > >>>>> "NR" == Nicolai Rosen <nick@netaxs.com> writes: > > NR> In context he was implying a Word type word processor. Are you > > NR> talking about emacs? I thought it was written in C w/ a lot of > > NR> configuration and scripts and whatnot done in Lisp? > > > > Emacs is essentially a lisp interpreter. Some of the high-frequency > > functions and basic buffer manipulation is done in C. > > > > C and Header > > 258965 lines 7484242 bytes > > > > Lisp > > 490238 lines 17970670 bytes > > > > Thats from the root directory of GNU emacs-20.6 > > > > A little eyeballing, and 2/3 of emacs (by line) is LISP. It's even > > more by bytes. > > > > $emacs++; > > > > -R > > > > > > **Majordomo list services provided by PANIX <URL:http://www.panix.com>** > **To Unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe phl" to majordomo@lists.pm.org** > Nicolai Rosen nick@netaxs.com Earthstation/Netaxs **Majordomo list services provided by PANIX <URL:http://www.panix.com>** **To Unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe phl" to majordomo@lists.pm.org**
|
|