|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: Beginner's problem, maybe with grep()
|
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 08:33:24PM -0500, Susie J wrote:
> No, I didn't. However, doesn't seem to be up to date. Google is listed as
> pre-1.0, and is showing up as 1.2 in my logs.
Ah. Serves me right for not looking at it more closely...
> I _knew_ that code section needed a disclaimer :). Yes, yes, yes, and not
> all crawlers look at robots.txt (like the email harvesters). In general,
> crawlers don't include a referrer, instead issuing a direct request. For
> you, the check has expanded to be (on the referrers list) and (direct
> request).
It's good to hear that you came up with a better solution, though. Hashes
that are used non-obviously can be just plain *neat*. (See the Cookbook
about finding the union and intersection of two or more arrays, for
example.)
--
Bill Jonas | "In contrast to the What You See Is What You
bill@billjonas.com | Get (WYSIWYG) philosophy, UNIX is the You
http://www.billjonas.com/ | Asked For It, You Got It operating system."
http://www.debian.org/ | --Scott Lee, as quoted by Lamb and Robbins
**Majordomo list services provided by PANIX <URL:http://www.panix.com>**
**To Unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe phl" to majordomo@lists.pm.org**
|
|