Jim Trocki on Wed, 8 Jan 2003 14:36:27 -0500


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Detecting Background


On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Joe Smith wrote:

> Jim Trocki wrote:
> > ...
> > the safest bet would be to pass it an argument telling it what
> > the behavior should be...
>
> And isn't the simplest 'argument' to pass '>/dev/null' ;-)

>/dev/null doesn't make the program suppress its output, it simply throws
it away. there's a difference, but i'm not sure if it even matters for
Urb's situation. let's let him decide.

"background process" is a meaningless (or at best undefined) label in
unixland, anyway :)
-
**Majordomo list services provided by PANIX <URL:http://www.panix.com>**
**To Unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe phl" to majordomo@lists.pm.org**