Jim Trocki on Wed, 8 Jan 2003 14:36:27 -0500 |
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Joe Smith wrote: > Jim Trocki wrote: > > ... > > the safest bet would be to pass it an argument telling it what > > the behavior should be... > > And isn't the simplest 'argument' to pass '>/dev/null' ;-) >/dev/null doesn't make the program suppress its output, it simply throws it away. there's a difference, but i'm not sure if it even matters for Urb's situation. let's let him decide. "background process" is a meaningless (or at best undefined) label in unixland, anyway :) - **Majordomo list services provided by PANIX <URL:http://www.panix.com>** **To Unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe phl" to majordomo@lists.pm.org**
|
|