David Steuber on 25 Nov 2003 13:29:36 -0500 |
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 04:11:22AM -0500, Mark Dominus wrote: > Mark Rogaski <wendigo@pobox.com>: > I think the correct answer to the question is that there's no reason > in principle why Walt's idea doesn't work, and that it could be made > to work without much difficulty, but nobody has ever bothered. I agree with this. I was rather surprised about the whole thing and tried it myself. Perl is emiting a syntax error, not quietly failing. I tried a couple different variations of the theme but none of them worked. Unless the language definition has some strange prohibition in it, I would call this a bug in Perl. I even tried the more verbose 'for ($c[0] = 0; $c[0] < 5; $c[0]++)' with no success. Perl would have none of it. -- David Steuber | telco:610.436.1677 302 E Marshall St | http://www.david-steuber.com/ Apt 612 | (do ((a 1 b) (b 1 (+ a b))) West Chester, PA 19380 | (nil a) (print a)) - **Majordomo list services provided by PANIX <URL:http://www.panix.com>** **To Unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe phl" to majordomo@lists.pm.org**
|
|