Charles Stack on Sun, 13 Feb 2000 17:55:09 -0500 (EST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: [PLUG] DSL is working


Of course, to directly his Windows machine to the linux box, he'll either
need a hub or a cross-connect cable.  His choice.

-----Original Message-----
From: plug-admin@lists.nothinbut.net
[mailto:plug-admin@lists.nothinbut.net]On Behalf Of Charles Stack
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2000 5:50 PM
To: plug@lists.nothinbut.net
Subject: RE: [PLUG] DSL is working


Since he only has one other machine to connect, I didn't feel a hub was
necessary.  By setting up IP Masq and use the linux box as the default
gateway, he'll meet his immediate need without having to get multiple IPs.
He can always add a hub or switch later if he wants to add more machines.

He could set up his box as a gateway without masq, but that would mean he
needs more routable IPs at $5 more a month.  Wouldn't take long to save that
money using an IP Masq setup and a second NIC (3 or 4 months tops).  That's
what we do at work and it runs very well.  We have some twenty machines
sharing a single static IP.  The only downfall is that I wish we had some
sort of traffic shaper to control the bandwidth used by each workstation.

Charles

-----Original Message-----
From: plug-admin@lists.nothinbut.net
[mailto:plug-admin@lists.nothinbut.net]On Behalf Of vkenny
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2000 8:26 PM
To: plug@lists.nothinbut.net
Subject: Re: [PLUG] DSL is working


In Re. IPMasq
It'd be easier to get a 4 port hub and use your Linus system as the default
gateway.  for someone to access your system, all they'd have to do is
telnet ( or preferably ssh ( Nod to Kyle) cause telnet sends authentication
in cleartext) to your gateway, and then move on to whatever other system
you may have set up.
if you've already got the NICs, then the only thing you'd need would be the
hub, which should cost about a bill.
Peace,.
V


"Gregory T. Weber" wrote:

> Much thanks to PLUG member Charles Stack for guiding me through setting
> up my DSL connection.  I thought I would summarize what I have learned
> in case others are in the same position (Got DSL but know nothing about
> Networking and your ISP doesn't want to talk Linux).  My task was to set
> up DSL on both my Window's 98 legacy machine that my wife is fond of and
> my  Linux box.  Really,  I all needed to know was what to plug in where.
>
> I started to try to do this through the Control Panel.  Charles strongly
> recommended using  linuxconf over Control Panel and provided the
> following directions.
>
> a) Go to Config|Networking|Client Tasks|Basic Host Information
> b) In Host name, give your machine a name (I used angler.voicenet.com)
> c) Under Adapter 1...
>     1) Check Enabled
>     2) Config Mode should be either manual or DHCP depending on what
> VoiceNet told you.
>     3) If manual...
>         a) Enter your IP address (either 10.0.0.X or your static IP>
> (whatever voicenet told you).
>         b) Set your netmask.
>         c) Set your Net device to eth0
>         d) Select the correct Kernel module for your network card (I
> used 3x509)
>    4) If DHCP, you'll need to set c)3)c) and c)3)d). (I think).
> d) Click the Accept button.
> e) Go to Config|Networking|Client tasks| Name server specification (DNS)
>
> f) Set the following...
>     1) Check DNS Usage.
>     2) default domain = voicenet.com (or whatever YOUR domain is)
>     3) Enter IP address of DNS server 1
>     4) Enter IP address of DNS server 2
> g) Click Accept
> h) Go to Config|Networking|Routine and gateways|Set Defaults
>  i) For Default Gateway, you'll enter the IP address of your DSL modem.
>  j) Don't worry about Enable Routing unless you are setting up to be a
> router.
> k) Accept the changes.
>  l) Click Quit and Activate the Changes.
>
>     If all goes well, you should be able to surf the web.
>
> So it did go well and I now have both Windows and Linux using DSL.
> Seems easy enough now that I have done it once (kind of embarrassing
> really).  I currently only have one IP address so only one machine can
> be connected at a time.  So I have to buy another IP from Voicenet
> ($5/mo).  Charles suggested using IP Masq to get around this.
> Apparently,  if I had  two NICs in my box , IP Masq could allow many
> machines to share a single IP address.  The downside being that  nobody
> will be able to directly access the masqueraded machines as they would
> be on a private network.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Greg
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Philadelphia Linux Users Group       -       http://plug.nothinbut.net
> Announcements - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
> General Discussion   -   http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug



______________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group       -       http://plug.nothinbut.net
Announcements - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion   -   http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug


______________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group       -       http://plug.nothinbut.net
Announcements - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion   -   http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug


______________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group       -       http://plug.nothinbut.net
Announcements - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion   -   http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug