aab on Tue, 9 May 2000 10:15:05 -0400 (EDT) |
It's been a while since I've looked at Science Citation Index, but last I knew it needed some help still. They lose a significant portion of cites due to mistypes that could VERY easily be rectified. Course, I'm a twink for never approaching anyone up there about this. andrew. On Tue, 9 May 2000, Jason Costomiris wrote: > Sounds like ISI - Institute for Scientific Information. A good bunch of > guys. I worked on a team a few years back on developing one of their > online research products. A good bunch of guys with some really sharp > talent internally. How sharp? Sharp enough to write an indexing > and searching system that could tear through 100k journal articles and > return the results for the keyword "blood" in under a second. That > was on a Sparc 10 (running a HyperSparc 125 or 150 proc)... > > -- > Jason Costomiris <>< | Technologist, geek, human. > jcostom {at} jasons {dot} org | http://www.jasons.org/ > > ______________________________________________________________________ > Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://plug.nothinbut.net > Announcements - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug-announce > General Discussion - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://plug.nothinbut.net Announcements - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|