|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] Win200 OS Loader v. LILO
|
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Michelle Weber wrote:
> I have an triple boot system at the moment, Win98, Win2000 Pro, and Win2000
> Server. Obviously they all work extremely well with the Win2000 OS Loader.
> I need to install linux to this machine, because it's the only one I have
> that can handle GNOME, since I'm having a helluva time getting gnome to work
> in solaris on school machines. SO, here is my question, having Win2000 on
> my system, should I use LILO or the Win2000 loader? I know with NT 4.0
> installed, it was recommended to use the NT loader. Is it the same for
> Win2000? And if this is true, would the instructions from the Dual-booting
> Linux and NT HOWTO work? Or is the Win2000 OS loader radically different?
>From what I know of the Win2k boot loader, it functions in a very similar
manner to the NT boot loader. The procedure for a WinNT/Linux dual-boot
should work.
Michael W. Ryan, MCP, MCT | OTAKON 2000
mryan@netaxs.com | Convention of Otaku Generation
http://www.netaxs.com/~mryan/ | http://www.otakon.com/
No, I don't hear voices in my head;
I'm the one that tells the voices in your head what to say.
______________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://plug.nothinbut.net
Announcements - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|