Mental on Wed, 18 Apr 2001 08:05:02 -0400 |
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 09:52:48PM -0400, Michael Leone wrote: > On 17 Apr 2001 17:02:04 -0400, Rupert Heesom wrote: > > On 17 Apr 2001 11:13:26 -0400, Mental wrote: > > > How useful would it be if you could manage user accounts/mail > > > delivery/aliases/whatever from one central place for multiple OS's? > > > > > > I've decided that pam, ldap and samba are just itching to be tied together > > > into one killer app. > > > > > > > I think LDAP is similar to Novell's NDS (eDirectory) or MS Active > > Directory,isn't it? > > No. e-Directory and Microsoft Active Directory (i.e., MAD :-) are much > more than LDAP. A full directory service contains info on ALL KINDS of > things that are in a network - users, machines, addresses, access > rights, etc. Users: got it addresses: got it access rights: I think I have it, need a better definition machines: need more info Active Directory is essentially an extended ldap directory that uses kerberos (I believe) for authentication. The linux journal had an article about it a month or 3 ago. It'd be good to know what features I'm missing. That way I can fix it. -- Mental ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|