Jeff Abrahamson on Sat, 2 Jun 2001 14:40:05 -0400 |
I'm trying to understand a subtlety about ipchains and routing across two ethernet interfaces. At home (in Philadelphia), I have a cheap old machine with two ethernet cards that acts as firewall and routes from DSL to my LAN. Then I do my real work and have my data on a different box on the LAN. This makes it relatively easy to understand the firewall. As you may know if you read a recent missive from me, I'm temporarily living in Europe (Paris, for work). And the machine I was going to use for the firewall is toast, or, at least, the power supply, but it's an old Mac, and it's not worth the effort to get working and buy parts for, imho, just to bring up PPC linux on an old machine. So I'm trying to figure out how much more vulnerable I am if I put two ethernet cards on my real machine with real data. I think that if I then use some simple ipchains (a la what Darxus posted, for the sake of concrete example) that basically says I'm only listening to ssh on the outside port, that I have some reasonable expectation of privacy on that machine, even if I bring up, say, apache, for internal use. Or X, or gnome, or anything else that listens to a socket for local use. Does this sound correct? Or am I missing something and I should really go out and find an old machine somewhere? -- Jeff Jeff Abrahamson <http://www.purple.com/jeff/> ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|