M. Jackson Wilkinson on Tue, 3 Jul 2001 21:30:04 -0400 |
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 09:09:38PM -0400, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote: > Where do you think English was spoken most in the 17th century, > being as there *was* no United States, but rather a British colony > (property of the mother land)? It was the latter part of the paragraph that I found most interesting, though, saying that only half of the usage panel found that its use in the "at present" sense was acceptable. > Popular usage (and Strunk & White) have reclaimed "presently" for > what it actually *means*. ("present" is so clearly the root of that > word it hurts.) Though I've always felt that if society went though such pains as to change the meaning away from what would be so incredibly logical, then it should certainly be honored. :-P This is just a topic that I debated a while ago (from the other side) and lost brutally (which tends to be rare in my case), so I take care not to get into the same situation. Apologies for any arrogance :-P -- M. Jackson Wilkinson <jackw@jounce.net> Jounce Multimedia Services Voicemail: 877-832-9021 Cell: 215-919-1513 ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|