gabriel rosenkoetter on Sat, 27 Oct 2001 02:48:15 -0400 |
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:09:46PM -0400, Arthur S. Alexion wrote: > Found it. Thanks! Make sure that this libc.so.5 RPM hasn't written over the main libc.so sym link from your system, which you want to point to the appropriate libc.so that came with your system (with RH 6.2, it might well be libc.so.4). Your kernel wants that shared object, and if your kernel gets confused about libc, you're in for a world of hurt. (In any kind of sane world, your kernel is explicitly looking for libc.so.4 not accepting any old libc.so, but you're not living in quite a sane world, you're living in the RedHat world. As much respect as I have for the people I know at Cygnus, and as much as RH releases have gotten much better recently--though I could do without that xinetd cruft--you're using the most bug-ridden RH release to date.) -- ~ g r @ eclipsed.net Attachment:
pgpvhwo7kOvAr.pgp
|
|