William Shank on Thu, 13 Dec 2001 15:20:08 +0100 |
so that would mean that konqueror is better at displaying MS specific HTML than w3c html? doubtful... -----Original Message----- From: Arthur S. Alexion To: plug@lists.phillylinux.org Sent: 12/13/01 7:40 AM Subject: Re: [PLUG] interesting experiment The site checks the browser and sends "more w3c like code" to non-IE browsers. It sends proprietary MSHTML to IE. Doubt its a conspiracy, and don't think the intent is that it be crappier. Just that MS Visual Studio, most likely used to create the site, is weak at doing things w/o the proprietary tags. art William Shank wrote: > using konqueror (i'm using kde2.2.2, but i don't know how much it matters) > go to http://www.msnbc.com and observe the formatting. Now, under the tools > menu, select Change Broswer Identification --> IE 5.5 on Windows 2000. > reobserver the formatting. notice anything? > > what do you think is causing this discrepency? i'm certain the rendering > engine isn't changed to be more compatible with IE based html. So does this > mean that konqueror handles IE html better than other html? is the site > sending crappy html to non-ie browsers on purpose? is this poor quality > assurance? is there a conspiracy? > > -chris ____________________________________. artAlexion ------------- arthur@alexion.com www.alexion.com ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|