kevin mudrick on Thu, 24 Jan 2002 23:40:00 -0500 |
> And yet it was NOT the same. The look was noticeably different. > > Honestly, it doesn't bother me all that much, to use xfs. Apparently, it > doesn't bother the Mandrake distribution, which configures and activates > it by default, if you choose to install X v4. I've got xfs running on my box too (debian, sid), after some suggestions in a kde irc channel that it might fix some non-kde app font problems in kde, a while back. It seemed to help. I also always remember xfs (or xfstt?) being installed back when I had redhat, too. Anyway, why is xfs a security risk, as someone mentioned? Or did I miss the part of the thread where that was discussed? thanks, Kevin =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= (kevin mudrick) (kevin@furhurts.com) (www.bleachedwhale.com) pgp key available at http://www.bleachedwhale.com/kevinGPG.asc =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "Hippies! Hiiiippiiiies! Everywhere! They want to save the earth, but all they do is smoke pot and smell bad!" - Eric Cartman ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|