Re: [PLUG] SAMBA-TNG?

["Bradley J. Molnar" <brad@student.usyd.edu.au>]

It was supposed to be fairly decent at being a windows pdc, but, I don't 
remember hearing that it ever made it very far (in terms of pounding out 
all of the bugs).  However, most of the stuff that was to be really 
awesome about Samba-tng has been (or will very shortly be) incorporated 
into the regular samba.

I have used samba (2.2 series) as a pdc and the university I am at right 
now (university of sydney) uses a samba 2.2.3a machine as a pdc and wins 
server.

Check out the samba 3.0 series (still in alpha or beta) for improved pdc 
support.


-brad

W. Chris Shank wrote:

> has anyone tried using samba-tng as a windows pdc? how did it go? what 
> limitations did you find? what is the advantage over using regular samba 
> 2.2.1?
>
> thx
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Philadelphia Linux Users Group       -      http://www.phillylinux.org
> Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
> General Discussion  -  http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug




______________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group       -      http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  -  http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug