Kyle R . Burton on Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:52:03 -0400 |
> > MS has the power to force an audit through the BSA. Since most school > > districts are run/owned by local government, that gives the BSA more > > leagal/political power over school districts. > > Any idea what gives BSA any legal power in the first place? MS software comes with a license agreement -- by virtue of agreeing to the license for the operating system, I think you've agreed to grant MS, or a third party on their behalf, the right to audit you for compliance. Actualy, there was an article recently by the FSF that talked about one of the core differences between propritary software and OSS. With propritary software, copyright didn't give corporations enough control over end users (copyright allows for some things under fair use that corporations would rather that you didn't do). A license argeement goes above and beyond copyright, taking away some of the rights granted to you by copyright. OSS is not licensed in any way -- a user does not agree to any license when using OSS. There is a copyright with OSS (the GPL in many of the pertinent cases), which constrains what you can do in the event that you want to change and distribute the source code -- but it says nothing about how you otherwise use the software. I'm glad to see this sparked some discussion. Thanks for talking about it. Kyle -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wisdom and Compassion are inseparable. -- Christmas Humphreys mortis@voicenet.com http://www.voicenet.com/~mortis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|