|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] Mutt replies as attachments?
|
I have noticed that Outlook 2000 Express and KMAIL gets attachments and
Outlook 2002 does not.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Brian P. Mohr LPIC-1, LCA, MCSE+I, MCT, CNE, CCDA, 100% Geek
http://www.bpmohr.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Lavin" <jlavin@ccil.org>
To: <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: [PLUG] Mutt replies as attachments?
> Haven't sent one to him without a signature, but he does get two
> attachments - one with the sig, one with the body.
>
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Michael C. Toren wrote:
>
> > > > It also crossed my mind that non-standards following MUAs aren't
> > > > interpreting mutt's e-mails properly, but I have no proof to back
that up.
> > >
> > > FYI - Eudora 5.x is the client that I'm told is showing my replies as
> > > attachments. I'm sure there are others...
> >
> > Do they still see your messages as attachments if you don't sign them?
> >
> > -mct
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org
> > Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
> > General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
> >
> >
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org
> Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
> General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
>
______________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|