ian reinhart geiser on Fri, 28 Jun 2002 04:50:08 +0200 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 27 June 2002 10:20 pm, John Lavin wrote: > Bill Jonas said: > > What would people think about using this procedure for keysignings? > > (The second listed procedure; the non-quoted part.) It would certainly > > speed things a good deal when we have larger keysignings. > > I think our procedure is just fine. If we had more than a couple dozen > people at most participating, perhaps the overhead would come in handy, > but I don't see the need.. You must have missed the last one. Either I have to lay off the half liter of Coke before the meeting, or we take a long time. I think the biggest turn off ot key signing for me is the extra 15-20 minutes it adds to the meeting. I think we would get more involvement if we could speed things up just a little bit. Just my 2 very caffinated cents ;) - -ian reinhart geiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9G8v7Py62TRm8dvgRAmAcAKCTYka49IiY6wCLt9Yc33iQFPjhJACfby79 lqXG2+nk/1P/7mxTCIeV+/o= =AyRu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|