|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 02:26, Fred K Ollinger wrote:
> > Having different tools is a good thing. Having different languages is a good
> > thing. Being able to express solutions in different ways to meet different
> > requirements IMHO is a good thing.
>
> Usually, I would agree, but now I'm thinking no. True, I would want more
> options, but I wouldn't want to maintain a codebase which is a hodgepodge
> of a million languages. We are not at that point yet, but we do have a
> problem in my current job w/ some scripts b/c they are in python and
> nobody knew that language. Python my very well best perl, but it was a
> hassle to find someone to fix it.
>
Whic is one reason I stick to pascal over other languages like modula
that might technically be "better".
-- noah silva
______________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|