gabriel rosenkoetter on Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:41:22 -0400 |
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 02:26:27PM -0400, William H. Magill wrote: > But the end-user support side-effect remains. It is the unintended > consequence of having the "Reply-to" point only back to the list: The end-user support issue is *entirely* in the MUA. There's no law saying that an MUA must respect a Reply-To: header. And a good work around for this problem is to specifically suggest that replies be private... which Kevin did. Which is the only reason I even bothered to comment. Surely, on a mailing list discussing a more-complicated-than- average operating system, it's not too much to hope that people know how to use their MUA, is it? -- gabriel rosenkoetter gr@eclipsed.net Attachment:
pgp2ufFBnQAq9.pgp
|
|