christophe barbe on Mon, 25 Nov 2002 21:10:06 -0500 |
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 11:26:19PM -0500, Rahul Karnik wrote: > >I personally consider unstable (that I call sid because it is not > >unstable) a very good choice if you are aware of the debian dev. > > And yet, unstable is still behind in some respects, e.g. gcc 3.2 is not > supported as the core compiler yet. Meanwhile we have (at least) Gentoo > 1.4, RedHat 8.0 and Mandrake 9.0. What about the libc6? AFAIK debian is still ahead. I don't want to troll so I stop here. Christophe -- Christophe Barbé <christophe.barbe@ufies.org> GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about. -- John von Neumann _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|