epike on Thu, 26 Dec 2002 15:50:30 -0500 |
hi i dont really understand all of ICMP yet, would it be a bad idea to just allow all ICMP packets? e pike / jondz > > > ################################################################# > > # ICMP TYPES (incomplete) > > # -------------------------- > > # (ideas gathered from fw script of vogt@hansenet.com) > > # > > # 0 - echo reply > > # 8 - echo > > # 3 - Destination Unreachable > > # 11 - Time Exceeded > > I would also recommend permitting ICMP type 4, source quench messages. > > > # 30 - Traceroute > > ICMP type 30 is currently unused, and can be safely left out of your > firewall configuration. (It was proposed in RFC1393 for the purposes of > introducing a new method of tracerouting -- rather than sending multiple > probe packets with varying TTL values, a single probe packet would have > been sent containing an IP option. In addition to forwarding packets > containing this IP option normally, gateways would have also sent an ICMP > type 30 response to the packet's originator. It's a much more elegant > solution, and it's a shame no major router vendor ever implemented it.) > > -mct > _________________________________________________________________________ > Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org > Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce > General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug > _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|