Gregson Helledy on Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:38:05 -0500 |
Fred, I'm not sure that I understand this. You're not permitted to use the source, but if someone else packages the source into an rpm for you, then it's ok? I'm neither a UNIX guru nor an IT professional, but this does not make sense to me. Unless it's that they want the rpm directly from Red Hat for security/stability reasons... Question for the list: how much work (hours) would it likely be for a competent person to take the source and make an rpm for it? Greg >Incidentally, does anyone have an rpm for gcc-3.2 for rh7.2. Upgrading >right now to rh8 is not an option. I wish I could somehow get this rpm >installed on a bunch of machines. My idea to use the source was vetoed. -- Privileged/Confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and notify GRA, Inc. (gramail@gra-inc.com) immediately. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet e-mail for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by GRA, Inc. unless otherwise indicated by an authorized representative independent of this message. _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|