| David Shaw on Thu, 27 Feb 2003 18:41:04 -0500 |
|
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:14:17PM -0500, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote: > Keep in mind David's also having mentioned that he's using a > development version of GnuPG, and that someone using that nym and > email address is a GnuPG developer. So if this is some kind of > plot, it's a pretty elaborate one. (And, who cares if it *is* a > plot in this circumstance, since, from what I can tell, his advice > has been correct thus far. I didn't just blindly run the commands > he suggested, obviously, but I wouldn't do that under any > circumstances.) Seems more likely to guess that he's using this > development version of GnuPG with a non-permanent key in case > something goes wrong. If it quacks like a duck... > It'd still be nice to see some cross-signing and propogation of the > key, though. > > > David, do you have a secret other key? Could you cross sign them? > > And, while you're at it, send it off to the pgp.net servers, > brokeness of pks not-with-standing? I would if I could. Unfortunately, most of the keyservers are still running pks 0.9.5 or earlier which can't handle more than one subkey - and mangles the key if you try. I fixed pks to at least ignore any additional subkeys in pks 0.9.6, but not all of the keyservers have upgraded yet. David Attachment:
pgpZIrogwsjhh.pgp
|
|