Martin DiViaio on Fri, 21 Mar 2003 20:25:26 -0500


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] /etc on a separate partition



The 1024 limit was imposed by old BIOS' not LILO/Grub/whatever. I think 
LILO still produces a warning if your kernel is not within the 1024 
barrier.


--
GPG Fingerprint: C900 18EF 0C36 4EAF A93C  F073 85D4 8B3C F3D8 077B

On the 21st day of March in the year 2003 you wrote:

> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 18:19:02 -0500
> From: Paul <paul@dpagin.net>
> To: plug@lists.phillylinux.org
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0
> 	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_03_05,USER_AGENT,
> 	      USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA,X_ACCEPT_LANG
> 	version=2.44
> Subject: Re: [PLUG] /etc on a separate partition
> 
> gabriel rosenkoetter wrote:
> 
> >As for why that's /boot, it's to ensure that if you can boot at all,
> >you can get to grub's configuration (recall that bootloaders must
> >be installed under the 1024th cylinder of your hard drive because of
> >the broken IA32 design).
> >
> I don't think the 1024 limit exists anymore.
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Philadelphia Linux Users Group        --       http://www.phillylinux.org
> Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
> General Discussion  --   http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
> 

_________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group        --       http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug