Martin DiViaio on Fri, 21 Mar 2003 20:25:26 -0500 |
The 1024 limit was imposed by old BIOS' not LILO/Grub/whatever. I think LILO still produces a warning if your kernel is not within the 1024 barrier. -- GPG Fingerprint: C900 18EF 0C36 4EAF A93C F073 85D4 8B3C F3D8 077B On the 21st day of March in the year 2003 you wrote: > Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 18:19:02 -0500 > From: Paul <paul@dpagin.net> > To: plug@lists.phillylinux.org > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 > tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_03_05,USER_AGENT, > USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA,X_ACCEPT_LANG > version=2.44 > Subject: Re: [PLUG] /etc on a separate partition > > gabriel rosenkoetter wrote: > > >As for why that's /boot, it's to ensure that if you can boot at all, > >you can get to grub's configuration (recall that bootloaders must > >be installed under the 1024th cylinder of your hard drive because of > >the broken IA32 design). > > > I don't think the 1024 limit exists anymore. > > _________________________________________________________________________ > Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org > Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce > General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug > _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|