Chris Hedemark on Wed, 23 Apr 2003 06:29:17 -0400 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
but all this "yes, it'll even run on this crappy machine" aside, i think the real reason why one of the BSD's is the good choice here is the ipf and ipnat duo. the configuration files for these are really straightforward, almost prose like really, and give you lots of control. just make sure you have console access when you start messing with the filter rules :) And for those who don't follow OpenBSD, ipf was replaced in OpenBSD a few releases ago with a ground-up re-implementation called "pf". pf was remarkably good on the first try, and has become dramatically better with every release. - -- "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." -- Isaac Asimov -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAj6maqwACgkQYPuF4Zq9lvZUMwCg7xoBPqrqKEzx0URDGGRe4D/v 9FsAnix+iX6zfTJcCpsuS03C5efArgXz =oCMP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|