William H. Magill on Wed, 4 Jun 2003 00:20:16 -0400 |
On Tuesday, June 3, 2003, at 10:28 PM, eric@lucii.org wrote: I'm considering buying a "pen drive" (USB - Flash Memory - portable) to transport some small files around (including my gpg key ring(s)). I believe that the biggest danger from the "flash" drives is the fact that they (still) have a very finite number of write cycles. Amd defines Endurance: "is a measure of the number of programming/erase cycles that a Flash memory array can achieve while retaining data integrity. This should not be confused with the number of times that a system could program a byte in the Flash device. 100,000 minimums guaranteed endurance cycles is the current industry requirement." While it says it should not be confused with... it doesn't say what it means, and they don't provide any "read-write" cycle information on-line, you have to request it. And while 100,000 sounds like a lot... it is a "new" number. Very recently, 1,000 was a standard number of cycles. (From what I can tell, the AMD 100,000 number is talking about one of their new products, MirrorBit, announced this time last year.) At any rate, I've been told that Flash Memory simply "Fails" when it "expires." No warnings and no recovery. Which is to say, using that for your key ring might be a dangerous thing to do in the longer term. Other than that, they seem to work pretty well, if "slow." T.T.F.N. William H. Magill # Beige G3 - Rev A motherboard - 768 Meg # Flat-panel iMac (2.1) 800MHz - Super Drive - 768 Meg # PWS433a [Alpha 21164 Rev 7.2 (EV56)- 64 Meg]- Tru64 5.1a magill@mcgillsociety.org magill@acm.org magill@mac.com _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|