Magnus Hedemark on 4 Dec 2003 10:40:03 -0500 |
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Jesse Huestis wrote: > I like solution 2 because to adds serveral layers to get around, I am > having trouble identifying all the ports I need. Right now I have found > 133-139 as some of the ports necessary, I think. It did not work when I > opened just those. Too many ports. 137/udp, 138/udp and 139/tcp are enough. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|