Re: [PLUG] UTF-8, Second Opinion

[Jeff Abrahamson <jeff@purple.com>]

On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 11:31:06AM -0500, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote:
>   [13 lines, 67 words, 421 characters]  Top characters: etainlhu
> 
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 11:21:35AM -0500, Jeff Weisberg wrote:
> > I used to think that way, then I needed a u-umlaut...
> 
> I should probably have been more specific: I'm speaking only of
> terminals, and am OUTRAGED at the frequency with which Red Hat
> decides to change their defaults (breaking, surely irrelevant,
> things... like perl Makefile.PL).
> 
> Anyway, u umlaut's u:, right? ;^>

No, that means that -u has a required argument. ;-)

-- 
 Jeff

 Jeff Abrahamson  <http://www.purple.com/jeff/>
 GPG fingerprint: 1A1A BA95 D082 A558 A276  63C6 16BF 8C4C 0D1D AE4B

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature