|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] White Box Linux experience?
|
Been using Fermi Lab's Scientific Linux distro since 3.0.1, no problems,
using yum for updates. Production mode on some clusters I maintain.
current:
ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/302/
website:
https://www.scientificlinux.org/
We initially rebuilt our own distro using the directions from WBEL (we have
some of our own kernel patches to roll in), but then other groups got in the
mix and we figured it would save a LOT of time and energy to use a pre-rolled
distro.
Regards,
Dan W.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 05:27:22PM -0400, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> At work, we need to support some customers on RHEL. I don't fancy
> the license costs just to maintain a dev/test environment, and I don't
> think Fedora's close enough to RHEL. Does anyone have experience with
> White Box or the other distros that are prepared by rebuilding the RHEL
> SRPMs? Some firsthand insight would be great.
--
-- Daniel Widyono --
-- www.widyono.net --
-- www.cis.upenn.edu/~widyono --
--
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|