Re: [PLUG] Netatalk performance?

["William H. Magill" <magill@mcgillsociety.org>]

On 27 Sep, 2004, at 10:32, W. Chris Shank wrote:
> Anyone have experience with the Linux version of Appletalk (netatalk)? 
> How
> does it perform with both OS 9 & OS X systems?  How does it compare to 
> MS's
> implementation? Is it noticeably faster/slower?

I think the main thing is, as others have pointed out, it's like NFS or 
any similar protocol.
Performance is "dependent" on many things, not the least of which are 
the specific CPU that is hosting, and the one which is receiving.

Netatalk has worked well for years (10+? maybe).

T.T.F.N.
William H. Magill
# Beige G3 - Rev A motherboard - 768 Meg
# Flat-panel iMac (2.1) 800MHz - Super Drive - 768 Meg
# PWS433a [Alpha 21164 Rev 7.2 (EV56)- 64 Meg]- Tru64 5.1a
# XP1000  [Alpha EV6]
magill@mcgillsociety.org
magill@acm.org
magill@mac.com
whmagill@gmail.com


___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug