Stephen Gran on 20 Nov 2004 15:11:03 -0000 |
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 10:06:06PM -0500, Eugene Smiley said: > I'm just curious if anyone has tried out Spamassassin 3.0.1 yet. I > just saw that the devs have added plugins to it to check SPF and > HashCash headers. I have been using SA3 since it released. 3.0.1 has much better memory management than 3.0.0, but I am still seeing SIGCHILD issues. Not sure if it's what you would call 'stable' yet, but it works for me. > It seems from this article > (http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2004/09/09/spamassassin.html) > that the minor upgrade issues revolve around changes to command line > options and changes to prefs file config names. And also bayes db format - see the UPGRADE instructions for details, but basically, if you want to retain all of your bayes info, you have to dump it out and add it back in. Blech. > Since I'm relatively new to Debian, how hard it is to try upgrading > Spamassassin from 2.64-1 on 'testing' to the 3.0.1 from 'unstable'. Trivial. Edit /etc/apt/sources.list, add a line for unstable. apt-get update; apt-get install spamassassin. Edit /etc/apt/sources.list, remove line for unstable. apt-get update. Or wait a week or so - the rc bugs are closed, and it will move into testing relatively shortly. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Stephen Gran | Know what I hate most? Rhetorical | | steve@lobefin.net | questions. -- Henry N. Camp | | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment:
pgpSvwqW4L3bi.pgp
|
|