Eric Hidle on 6 Dec 2004 15:21:03 -0000 |
I know that the LARTC method will work with DCA.net DSL. DCA connections are 100% unfooled around with.. Thanks for the info about the rp_filter - I do remember having to disable rp_filter for assymetric routing to work properly. Doug, I can send you my setup script if you want it. You'd just have to change the variables to suit your local setup... E ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael C. Toren" <mct@toren.net> To: <plug@lists.phillylinux.org> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 9:15 AM Subject: Re: [PLUG] routing question.... > On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 01:24:10AM -0500, Doug Crompton wrote: > > I am switching from PPP to Ethernet (DSL) and in the transition phase it > > would be nice. It seems that different paths - EG. in on PPP out on DSL > > or in on DSL out on PPP does not work. The data flows but the connection > > never establishes. Can't you have different RX/TX data paths? > > Asymmetric routing is indeed possible, however two items may be getting > in your way. The first is Linux's return-path verification, which as a > security precaution attempts to permit only symmetric routing. Debian > enables rp_filter by default; I don't know what the default settings are > for other distributions. To disable it, simply execute the following: > > echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/rp_filter > echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/ppp0/rp_filter > > The second item is that your upstream provider may also be implementing > return-path verification to prevent their customers from spoofing packets. > If you suspect this is the case, and if your dialup has a static IP, you > may want to contact them and see if they would be willing to temporarily > permit packets with a source address of your ppp0 through. > > > So instead of that, in a system with ppp0 and eth0 can you have the data > > go out the same path in came in on with the same IP- in esscense two route > > defaults. All data that came in on ppp0 goes out on ppp0 and data in on > > eth0 goes out on eth0. > > Yes, this is also possible. One solution is to implement policy routing > which will make routing decisions based on the source address rather than > the destination address. As Eric mentioned, the Linux Advanced Routing & > Traffic Control (LARTC) HOWTO is an excellent resource for configurations > such as this, and can be found at lartc.org. > > HTH, > -mct > > -- > perl -e'$u="\4\5\6";sub H{8*($_[1]%79)+($_[0]%8)}sub G{vec$u,H(@_),1}sub S{vec > ($n,H(@_),1)=$_[2]}$_=q^{P`clear`;for$iX){PG($iY)?"O":" "forX8);P"\n"}for$iX){ > forX8){$c=scalar grep{G@$_}[$i-1Y-1Z-1YZ-1Y+1ZY-1ZY+1Z+1Y-1Z+1YZ+1Y+1];S$iY,G( > $iY)?$c=~/[23]/?1:0:$c==3?1:0}}$u=$n;select$M,$C,$T,.2;redo}^;s/Z/],[\$i/g;s /Y > /,\$_/xg;s/X/(0..7/g;s/P/print+/g;eval' # Michael C. Toren <mct@toren.net> > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org > Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce > General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|