Eric Hidle on 16 Feb 2005 14:36:20 -0000 |
Not really surprising given that SHA-1 is essentially the same algorithm as MD5, which has already long been broken.. E ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stewart B. Lone" <592653589793238@snip.net> To: <plug@lists.phillylinux.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 9:11 AM Subject: [PLUG] http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html > > How will this affect the encryption program that most of us seem to use? > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFCE1SOnc2ybvLsO8URAsA8AJ9nmH2ckYAulcUDQiGkY9OL/WNT7ACeJdp4 > osEQesax7P9nvdPk0vLMzp0= > =XX3k > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org > Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce > General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|