|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html
|
The attack is something that makes cryptographers feel
all tingly inside, but for the forseeable future, it
will have no practical effect.
It takes 2^(69) operations to find a collision.
That's still a huge number.
--- "Stewart B. Lone" <592653589793238@snip.net>
wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html
>
> How will this affect the encryption program that
> most of us seem to use?
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
> http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
>
iD8DBQFCE1SOnc2ybvLsO8URAsA8AJ9nmH2ckYAulcUDQiGkY9OL/WNT7ACeJdp4
> osEQesax7P9nvdPk0vLMzp0=
> =XX3k
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
___________________________________________________________________________
> Philadelphia Linux Users Group --
> http://www.phillylinux.org
> Announcements -
>
http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
> General Discussion --
> http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|