Paul L. Snyder on 12 May 2005 17:54:14 -0000 |
Quoting Cosmin Nicolaescu <cos@camelot.homelinux.com>: > On Thu, May 12, 2005 1:35 pm, sean finney said: > > On Thu, May12, 2005 at 12:00:09PM -0400, William H. Magill wrote: > >> FreeBSD runs much better on the Alphas than NetBSD. FreeBSD Alpha is > >> still under active development, don't know about NetBSD. > > > > and there's always debian :) > > > > sean > > don't forget gentoo ;) And don't forget...Windows NT. I think I still have an NT-for-Alpha CD kicking around somewhere. Though it, er, isn't what you could call "under active development". On the plus side, most of the Windows exploits out there are x86-specific, so you would have what might be called security through perversity. pls ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|