William H. Magill on 8 Dec 2005 03:54:13 -0000 |
On 07 Dec, 2005, at 14:19, Michael C. Toren wrote: On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 11:58:18AM -0500, Mike Ciul wrote:but after my wife looked into the situation, this appears to be illegal - contractors are supposed to advertise and the clients are supposed to come to them. They are paid by the job, not by the hour. The "contractor" must also have more than one employer. (Not necessarily concurrently, but serially, such as with a consultant, or otherwise be obviously "self employed.") The "employer" may not define who is and who is not a contractor, unless they are advertising for bids. Any individual "hired" by a company is an employee. To be a contractor, there must be a bidding process. The "direction over the performance of his services" and definition of hours determines weather or not the individual is an "exempt employee." That is to say, someone who is NOT subject to the wage hour laws which dictate the payment of overtime, mandatory coffee breaks and the like. This 1099 ploy has been used by shyster organizations -- both profit and non-profit for many years to avoid paying Social Security and other Wage related taxes (as well as minimum wage, and other wage hour issues). It's been pretty easy to "break" employers who try to use the 1099 ploy in the for-profit sector (including Education). I don't have any experience with the rest of the non-profit world. In general, the interest of the Labor and Industry folks is directly related to the amount of Tax not being paid by the entity. T.T.F.N. William H. Magill # Beige G3 [Rev A motherboard - 300 MHz 768 Meg] OS X 10.2.8 # Flat-panel iMac (2.1) [800MHz - Super Drive - 768 Meg] OS X 10.4.1 # PWS433a [Alpha 21164 Rev 7.2 (EV56)- 64 Meg] Tru64 5.1a # XP1000 [Alpha 21264-3 (EV6) - 256 meg] FreeBSD 5.3 # XP1000 [Alpha 21264-A (EV 6.7) - 384 meg] FreeBSD 5.3 magill@mcgillsociety.org magill@acm.org magill@mac.com whmagill@gmail.com
|
|