George Gallen on 15 Aug 2006 16:31:37 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: [PLUG] U320 SCSI vs FAS drives...

Title: U320 SCSI vs FAS drives...
apparantly, they were talkiing SAS drives, not FAS (Language barrier)
-----Original Message-----
From: plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org [mailto:plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org]On Behalf Of George Gallen
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 12:21 PM
To: plug@lists.phillylinux.org
Subject: [PLUG] U320 SCSI vs FAS drives...

We are looking into a new system,

initially, we had requested a U320 RAID 0+1 to 10 15K SCSI drives in an external enclosure
and one of the places is suggesting 10 15K drives with FAS and not SCSI

Which is better? pitfalls?

I'm just looking into FAS now, and have not had any experience with it.

Does Fedora 5 support FAS?

Thanks

George Gallen
Senior Programmer/Analyst
Accounting/Data Division
ggallen@slackinc.com
ph:856.848.1000 Ext 220

SLACK Incorporated - Delivering the best in health care information and education worldwide.
http://www.slackinc.com 


___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug