Mike Leone on 19 Oct 2007 19:13:01 -0000 |
On Fri, October 19, 2007 2:30 pm, Matthew Rosewarne wrote: > On Friday 19 October 2007, Greg Lopp wrote: >> You are correct, but then he has an exact duplicate of the old drive and >> a >> whole bunch of empty space because the new drive is larger....but making >> use of that unused space might be an easier problem to solve than >> getting >> grub to work that first time > ' > While it might have been the only way to copy a Windows system, drive > imaging > isn't really a good wa to copy a Linux system. Copying the files over is > overwhelmingly faster than making a bit-for-bit copy of an entire disk, > much > of it empty space. It's also better to let the new filesystem to place > the > files, which should increase its performance. And more work, since I have like 5 partitions on the drive (one for /boot, one for /var, etc). I do enough work *at* work. :-) At home, the less setup time I do, the more time I get to actually use/enjoy the system ... As for expanding the partitions after imaging, I have Partition Magic, which I've sworn by for many years. These are ext3 partitions, btw, so they should just resize in the latest PM (v 8, I believe). -- ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|